POST PIECE ON MULKEY ... DON'T BOTHER

 So much for the Washington Post’s much-hyped piece on LSU women’s basketball coach KIM MULKEY … which came out Saturday (March 30) … and proved to be over-blown and over-written with next to nothing we didn’t already know … that she isn’t likable (and doesn’t care) … that she has always been hard on her players and makes no apologies for it … and that she will go to almost any length to protect her territory … It says here she is not unlike many people in her profession, men as well as women. The difference between Mulkey and most of them is … she isn’t filtered … She doesn’t say one thing and mean another. She comes right out with it which oftentimes backfires when people, especially those who don’t like her, stretch her meaning … The Post didn’t do the writer (or readers) any favors with a poor job of editing … allowing him to rely on innuendo when so many key witnesses (understandably) refused to be interviewed … As a result, Mulkey almost comes off favorably. Almost. I’m not a fan … but by now we should understand that beating down on someone we don’t like, only serves to make her (and/or him) stronger … especially those (like Mulkey) who look forward to a good fight and are seldom disappointed … If I had a regret (and, frankly regrets are like worrying, colossal wastes of time), it would be reading the entire piece, hoping I would learn something and, instead, actually wasting my time … of which, frankly, I have a whole lot.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DESPITE FLAK ... WHO ELSE IS BETTER COACH?

HOW DOES ARRUZA DO IT, KEEP SO MANY PLAYERS HAPPY EVEN IF THEY DON'T PLAY?

ARENA RETURNS ... SO WILL ELLIOTT ... MAYBE