WAPO DROPS SPORTS SECTION, WHY? ... AND, WHY CAN'T LOCAL TV USE MORE VISUALS?
So, The Washington Post joined The New York Times in eliminating its sports section because … it couldn’t afford it? Get serious More to the point, potential readers are getting younger and no longer take time (or have time) to digest the morning paper. Those that CAN read, that is. They prefer to be informed by cable news, in simple terms, quickly, without being burdened by in-depth coverage or much thought … I mean, why bother to be challenged when someone else can/will do your thinking for you? Sorry to say, most of the old timers the memory man knows no longer subscribe to the paper … turned off originally by liberal content that turns just about everything that used to be straight reporting into a bias that should be labeled OPINION but seldom is. Speaking of The Times-Dispatch … the local rag certainly was ahead of its time, among the industry’s leaders in cutting bac...